On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 5:14 AM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote: > > I admit I haven't done the legwork to nail down a test > > case where everything comes together just right to show user-visible > > breakage, but your success in finding one where it doesn't is no proof > > of anything. > > Respectfully, what made you think this was my intention?
Honestly I have no idea what your intention was and didn't mean to judge it. However, I don't think that troubleshooting the test case you put together is the thing that I want to spend time on right now, and I hope that it will still be possible to make some progress on the underlying issue despite that. > Quite the opposite, personally I am inclined to think that the problem > does exist. In order to fix it however we need a test that reliably > reproduces it first. Otherwise there is no way to figure out whether > the fix was correct or not. > > What the experiment showed is that the test scenario you initially > described is probably the wrong one for reasons yet to be understood > and we need to come up with a better one. Hopefully what Andres posted will help in this regard. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
