On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:56:53AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I suppose you're not thinking of applying this to current master, but > instead just leave it for when pg17 opens, right? I mean, clearly it > seems far too invasive to put it in after beta1. On the other hand, > it's painful to know that we're going to have code that exists only on > 16 and not any other release, in an area that's likely to have bugs here > and there, so we're going to need to heavily adjust backpatches for 16 > especially. > > I can't make up my mind about this. What do others think?
When I looked at the patch yesterday, my impression was that this would be material for v17 as it is refactoring work, not v16. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
