On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 02:21:53PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > The above assumes that the reader reviewed the previous paragraph and > followed the guidelines there. However, we can make it explicit. Please see > attached.
Yeah, I was under the same impression as Jacob that we don't insist enough in this new paragraph about what sslmode ought to be when I initially read the patch. However, looking at the html page produced, what you have to refer to the previous paragraph looks OK to me. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
