On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 14:26 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > TBH, I have a mixed feeling about this line of reasoning because > MAINTAIN is much broader and less specific than TRUNCATE, for > instance, being spawned across so much more operations.
... > Some users may find that surprising as they > used to have more control over these operations as owners of the > relations worked on. It seems like the user shouldn't be surprised if they can carry out the action; nor should they be surprised if they can't carry out the action. Having privileges revoked on a table from the table's owner is an edge case in behavior and both make sense to me. In the absense of a use case, I'd be inclined towards just being consistent with the other privileges. Regards, Jeff Davis