On 2023-06-21 We 05:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 20.06.23 17:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+1, although I wonder if we shouldn't follow pgindent's new lead
and require some argument(s).
That makes sense to me. Here is a small update with this behavior
change and associated documentation update.
I'm intending to add some of the new pgindent features to pgperltidy.
Preparatory to that here's a rewrite of pgperltidy in perl - no new
features yet but it does remove the hardcoded path, and requires you
to pass in one or more files / directories as arguments.
Are you planning to touch pgperlcritic and pgperlsyncheck as well?
Yeah, it would make sense to.
If not, part of my patch would still be useful. Maybe I should commit
my posted patch for PG16, to keep consistency with pgindent, and then
your work would presumably be considered for PG17.
That sounds like a good plan.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
