On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 02:12:44PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > The argv elements get shuffled around many times with the > patch. However, I couldn't find a way to decrease the count without > resorting to a forward scan. So I've concluded the current approach > is them most effeicient, considering the complexity.
Yeah, I'm not sure it's worth doing anything more sophisticated. > I tried some patterns with the patch and it generates the same results > with the glibc version. > > The TAP test looks fine and it catches the change. > > Everything looks fine to me. Thanks for reviewing. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
