Dear hackers, While discussing based on the article[1] with Japanese developers, I found inconsistencies between codes and documents.
45b1a67a[2] changed the behavior when non-ASCII characters was set as application_name, cluster_name and postgres_fdw.application_name, but it seemed not to be documented. Previously non-ASCII chars were replaed with question makrs '?', but now they are replaced with a hex escape instead. How do you think? Is my understanding correct? Acknowledgement: Sawada-san and Shinoda-san led the developer's discussion. Fujii-san was confirmed my points. Thank you for all of their works! [1]: https://h50146.www5.hpe.com/products/software/oe/linux/mainstream/support/lcc/pdf/PostgreSQL16Beta1_New_Features_en_20230528_1.pdf [2]: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=45b1a67a0fcb3f1588df596431871de4c93cb76f;hp=da5d4ea5aaac4fc02f2e2aec272efe438dd4e171 Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
doc_fix.patch
Description: doc_fix.patch
