> On 5 Jul 2023, at 14:49, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> On 2023-07-04 Tu 16:54, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 4 Jul 2023, at 20:19, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> But sadly we're kinda back where we started. fairywren is failing on 
>>> REL_16_STABLE. Before the changes the failure occurred because the test 
>>> script was unable to create the file with a path > 255. Now that we have a 
>>> way to create the file the test for pg_basebackup to reject files with 
>>> names > 100 fails, I presume because the server can't actually see the 
>>> file. At this stage I'm thinking the best thing would be to skip the test 
>>> altogether on windows if the path is longer than 255.
>>> 
>> That does sound like a fairly large hammer for a nail small enough that we
>> should be able to fix it, but I don't have any other good ideas off the cuff.
> 
> Not sure it's such a big hammer. Here's a patch.

No objections to the patch, LGTM.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to