> On 6 Jul 2023, at 16:42, Ranier Vilela <[email protected]> wrote: > Em qui., 6 de jul. de 2023 às 11:37, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
> #define SH_MAX_SIZE (((uint64) PG_UINT32_MAX) + 1) > This is Assert, that is, in production this test is not done. Correct, which implies that it's a test for something which is deemed highly unlikely to happen in production. > If the empty element is not found, startelem has PG_UINT64_MAX value, > which do not fit in uint32. Can you show an example where the hash isn't grown automatically to accomodate this such that the assertion is tripped? -- Daniel Gustafsson
