On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:32 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay. Here's a new patch set in which I believe I've addressed all > feedback. I didn't keep the GetAuthenticatedUserIsSuperuser() helper > function around, as I didn't see a strong need for it.
Thanks, I think the patch set looks good to go! > And I haven't > touched the "is_superuser" GUC, either. I figured we can take up any > changes for it in the other thread. Yeah, I think that makes sense. Thanks, Joe Koshakow
