Hi, On 2023-07-24 09:42:44 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > I don't know this code at all, but I hope that this can be solved with > > just Anton's proposed patch. > > Yes, it's just that off-by-one. I need to check if there's a similar bug for > local / temp table buffers though.
Doesn't appear that way. We *do* fail if there's only 1 remaining buffer, but we already did before my change (because we also need to pin the fsm). I don't think that's an issue worth worrying about, if all-1 of local buffers are pinned, you're going to have problems. Thanks Anton / Victoria for the report and fix. Pushed. Greetings, Andres Freund
