On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:16:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:11:02PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: >> Before I look at this again: Are there any objections to another CRC >> implementation for the reason of having no buildfarm member? > > [ ... ] > > Anyway, based on today's state of the buildfarm, we have a buildfarm > member named cisticola that should be able to test this new CRC > implementation, so I see no problem in applying this stuff now if you > think it is in good shape.
IMHO we should strive to maintain buildfarm coverage for all the instrinsics used within Postgres, if for no other reason than to ensure future changes do not break those platforms. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
