Hi, On 2023-08-11 12:59:27 -0500, Marcelo Juchem wrote: > In my case, my product has a very controlled environment. > We build all our infrastructure from source and we avoid dynamic linking by > design, except where technically not viable (e.g.: pgsql extensions). > > LLVM is one of the libraries we're specifically required to statically link. > Unfortunately I can't share the specifics of why that's the case.
If you build llvm with just static lib support it should work as-is? > On a side note, I'd like to take this opportunity to ask you if there's any > work being done towards migrating away from deprecated LLVM APIs. > If there's no work being done on that front, I might take a stab at it if > there's any interest from the PostgreSQL community in that contribution. Yes: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKNX_%3Df%2B1C4r06WETKTq0G4Z_7q4L4Fxn5WWpMycDj9Fw%40mail.gmail.com > Migrating to the new APIs will have PostgreSQL require at the minimum > version 8 of LLVM (released in March 2019). I think Thomas' patch abstract it enough so that older versions continue to work... Greetings, Andres Freund
