Greetings, On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 15:23 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:54 PM Jacob Champion <jchamp...@timescale.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 9:46 AM Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> > wrote: > > > Don't like 'skipped' but that feels closer. > > > > > > How about 'connection bypassed authentication'? > > > > Works for me; see v2. > > For what it's worth, my vote would be for "connection authenticated: > ... method=trust". I don’t have any particular objection to this language and agree that it’s actually closer to how we talk about the trust auth method in our documentation. Maybe if we decided to rework the documentation … or perhaps just ripped “trust” out entirely … but those are whole different things from what we are trying to accomplish here. Thanks, Stephen
