On Friday, August 25, 2023 12:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:45 PM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > I suggest we rename this setting to something starting with debug_.
> > Right now, the name looks much too tempting for users to fiddle with.
> > I think this is similar to force_parallel_mode.
> >
>
> +1. How about debug_logical_replication?
>
> > Also, the descriptions in guc_tables.c could be improved. For
> > example,
> >
> > gettext_noop("Controls when to replicate or apply each change."),
> >
> > is pretty content-free and unhelpful.
> >
>
> The other possibility I could think of is to change short_desc as:
> "Allows to replicate each change for large transactions.". Do you have any
> better ideas?How about "Forces immediate streaming or serialization of changes in large transactions." which is similar to the description in document. I agree that renaming it to debug_xx would be better and here is a patch that tries to do this. Best Regards, Hou zj
0001-Rename-logical_replication_mode-to-debug_logical_rep.patch
Description: 0001-Rename-logical_replication_mode-to-debug_logical_rep.patch
