Hi st 20. 9. 2023 v 9:34 odesílatel Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakre...@gmail.com> napsal:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 5:56 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > >... > > On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 11:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > That leads to a second idea, which is having it continue > > > to be a GUC but only affect directly-entered SQL, with all > > > indirectly-entered SQL either being stored as a node tree or having a > > > search_path property attached somewhere. > > > > That's not too far from the proposed patch and I'd certainly be > > interested to hear more and/or adapt my patch towards this idea. > > As an interested bystander, that's the same thing I was thinking when > reading this. I reread your original e-mail, Jeff, and I still think > that. > > I wonder if something like CURRENT (i.e., the search path at function > creation time) might be a useful keyword addition. I can see some uses > (more forgiving than SYSTEM but not as loose as SESSION), but I don't > know if it would justify its presence. > Personally, I dislike this - because the value of the search path is hidden in this case. I agree so it can be comfortable, but it can be confusing for review, migration, ... Regards Pavel > Thanks for working on this. > > Thanks, > Maciek > > >
