Hi, On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 19:44, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Given that, I'm inclined to agree that this is a bug. But we might > need to go through and make sure all of the code that deals with these > counters is on the same page about what the values represent. Maybe > there is code lurking somewhere that thinks these counters are only > supposed to include "shared" rather than, as the fragment above > suggests, "shared/local".
Thank you for the guidance. What do you think about the second patch, counting extend calls' timings in blk_write_time? In my opinion if something increments {shared|local}_blks_written, then it needs to be counted in blk_write_time too. I am not sure why it is decided like that. Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft