Hi, > Aleksander, previous discussion was not a discussion actually, we proposed > a set of big and complex core changes without any discussion preceding it. > That was not very good approach although the overall idea behind the patch > set is very progressive and is ready to solve some old and painful issues in > Postgres.
Not true. There *was* a discussion and you are aware of all the problems that were pointed out. Most importantly [1][2]. Also you followed the thread [3] and are well aware that we want to implement TOAST improvements in PostgreSQL core. Despite all this you are still insisting on the extendable design as if starting a new thread every year or so will change something. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230205223313.4dwhlddzg6uhaztg%40alap3.anarazel.de [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ7c6TOsHtGkup8AVnLTGGt-%2B7EzE2j-cFGr12U37pzGEsU6Fg%40mail.gmail.com [3]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAJ7c6TOtAB0z1UrksvGTStNE-herK-43bj22%3D5xVBg7S4vr5rQ%40mail.gmail.com -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
