On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 21:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > It is not the role that is modified. Perhaps: > > > > [...]; if omitted, the current role is used. > > Sure, attached. Here is the issue I have though, we are really not > changing default privileges for objects created in the future, we are > changing the role _now_ so future objects will have different default > privileges, right? I think wording like the above is kind of odd.
I see what you mean. The alternative is to be precise, at the risk of repeating ourselves: if omitted, default privileges will be changed for objects created by the current role. Yours, Laurenz Albe
