On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:03 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > That sounds good to me. Not having to parse the manifest server-side > sounds like a win, as does saving the transfer, for the cases where the > manifest is large.
OK. I'll look into this next week, hopefully. > Is this meant to support multiple timelines each with non-overlapping > adjacent ranges, rather than multiple non-adjacent ranges? Correct. I don't see how non-adjacent LSN ranges could ever be a useful thing, but adjacent ranges on different timelines are useful. > Do I have it right that you want to rewrite this bit before considering > this ready to commit? For sure. I don't think this is the only thing that needs to be revised before commit, but it's definitely *a* thing that needs to be revised before commit. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
