On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 7:06 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > Additionally, I found that the current patch can't handle infinite > range bounds and discards information about inclusiveness of range > bounds. The infinite bounds could be represented as NULL (while I'm > not sure how good this representation is). Regarding inclusiveness, I > don't see the possibility to represent them in a reasonable way within > an array of base types. I also don't feel good about discarding the > accuracy in the pg_stats view. >
in range_length_histogram, maybe we can document that when calculating the length of a range, inclusiveness will be true.
