On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:34:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm good with that answer --- I doubt that this test sequence is > proving anything that's worth the cycles it takes. If it'd catch > oversights like failing to add new stats types to the "reset all" > code path, then I'd be for keeping it; but I don't see how the > test could notice that.
For now I've applied a patch that removes the whole sequence. I'll keep an eye on the buildfarm for a few days in case there are more failures. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
