Hi,
On 2023-11-30 12:44:33 -0600, Tristan Partin wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Set reference point for stack-depth checking. This might seem
> > + * redundant in !EXEC_BACKEND builds; but it's not because the
> > postmaster
> > + * launches its children from signal handlers, so we might be
> > running on
> > + * an alternative stack. XXX still true?
> > + */
> > + (void) set_stack_base();
>
> Looks like there is still this XXX left. Can't say I completely understand
> the second sentence either.
We used to start some child processes of postmaster in signal handlers. That
was fixed in
commit 7389aad6366
Author: Thomas Munro <tmu...@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-12 12:34:23 +1300
Use WaitEventSet API for postmaster's event loop.
In some cases signal handlers run on a separate stack, which meant that the
set_stack_base() we did in postmaster would yield a completely bogus stack
depth estimation. So this comment should likely have been removed. Thomas?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
