On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:21 AM Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I mean to commit the open transaction at the below place in > > wait_for_relation_state_change() > > > > wait_for_relation_state_change() > > { > > ... > > -- commit the xact > > WaitLatch(); > > ... > > } > > > > Then start after the wait is over. This is just to test whether it > > improves the difference in regression test timing. > > I tried the above approach and observed that the performance of this > approach is nearly same as the previous approach. >
Then let's go with the original patch only. BTW, it took almost the same time (105 wallclock secs) in my environment (CentOs VM) to run tests in src/test/subscription both with and without the patch. I took a median of five runs. I have slightly adjusted the comments and commit message in the attached. If you are fine with this, we can commit and backpatch this. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
v3-0001-Fix-an-undetected-deadlock-due-to-apply-worker.patch
Description: Binary data