On Wed, 2023-11-29 at 20:31 +0700, John Naylor wrote: > Attached is a rough start with Andres's earlier ideas, to get > something concrete out there.
The implementation of string hash in 0004 forgot to increment 'buf'.
I tested using the new hash function APIs for my search path cache, and
there's a significant speedup for cases not benefiting from a86c61c9ee.
It's enough that we almost don't need a86c61c9ee. So a definite +1 to
the new APIs.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
