Hi, On 2023-12-04 15:08:57 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:18:05PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > Barring objections or additional feedback, I think I'm inclined to press > > forward with this one and commit it in the next week or two. I'm currently > > planning to keep the inline assembly, but I'm considering removing the > > configuration checks for __atomic_exchange_n() if the availability of > > __atomic_compare_exchange_n() seems like a reliable indicator of its > > presence. Thoughts?
I don't think we need the inline asm. Otherwise looks good. Greetings, Andres Freund
