On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:05 AM Josef Šimánek <josef.sima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> pá 15. 12. 2023 v 15:50 odesílatel Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal: > > > > Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> writes: > > > On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 13:21 +0100, Josef Šimánek wrote: > > >> Inspired by Simon Riggs' keynote talk at PGCounf.eu 2023 sharing list > > >> of ideas for PostgreSQL > > >> (https://riggs.business/blog/f/postgresql-todo-2023), I have crafted > a > > >> quick patch to do SQL syntax validation. > > >> > > >> What do you think? > > > > > I like the idea. But what will happen if the SQL statement references > > > tables or other objects, since we have no database? > > > > This seems like a fairly useless wart to me. What does it do that > > you can't do better with existing facilities (psql etc)? > > Per my experience, this is mostly useful during development to catch > syntax errors super early. I'd suggest helping this project get production capable since it already is trying to integrate with the development ecosystem you describe here. https://github.com/supabase/postgres_lsp I agree that developing this as a new executable for the purpose is needed in order to best conform to existing conventions. David J.
