On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 8:31 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:40 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > The individual transactions shouldn't cross > > 'logical_decoding_work_mem'. I got a bit confused by your proposal to > > maintain the lists: "...splitting it into two lists: transactions > > consuming 5% < and 5% >= of the memory limit, and checking the 5% >= > > list preferably.". In the previous sentence, what did you mean by > > transactions consuming 5% >= of the memory limit? I got the impression > > that you are saying to maintain them in a separate transaction list > > which doesn't seems to be the case. > > I wanted to mean that there are three lists in total: the first one > maintain the transactions consuming more than 10% of > logical_decoding_work_mem, >
How can we have multiple transactions in the list consuming more than 10% of logical_decoding_work_mem? Shouldn't we perform serialization before any xact reaches logical_decoding_work_mem? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
