On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:50 PM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> On 19.12.23 07:23, Richard Guo wrote: > > By chance I discovered that the comment for the typedefs of "double"s > > does not cover Cardinality. Should we update that comment accordingly, > > maybe something like below? > > > > - * Typedefs for identifying qualifier selectivities and plan costs as > such. > > - * These are just plain "double"s, but declaring a variable as > Selectivity > > - * or Cost makes the intent more obvious. > > + * Typedefs for identifying qualifier selectivities, plan costs and > > + * estimated rows or other count as such. These are just plain > "double"s, > > + * but declaring a variable as Selectivity, Cost or Cardinality makes > the > > + * intent more obvious. > > Fixed, thanks. Thanks for the fix! Thanks Richard
