>
>
> Additionally changes in 0007 looks dependent from 0005. Does replacement
> of slot inside ExecInsert, that is already used in the code below the call
> of
>
> >/* insert the tuple normally */
> >- table_tuple_insert(resultRelationDesc, slot,
> >- estate->es_output_cid,
> >- 0, NULL);
>
> could be done without side effects?
>
I'm sorry that I inserter not all relevant code in the previous message:
/* insert the tuple normally */
- table_tuple_insert(resultRelationDesc, slot,
- estate->es_output_cid,
- 0, NULL);
+ slot = table_tuple_insert(resultRelationDesc, slot,
+ estate->es_output_cid,
+
(Previously slot variable that exists in the ExecInsert() and could be used
later was not modified at the quoted code block)
Pavel.
