On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll
> > push it, barring any objections.
>
> This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks
> OK seen from here.
>
> As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most
> common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get
> excited about that either because that would require one to do more
> cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps.

Thank you for the comments. Agreed.

I've just pushed, bf6260b39.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to