Hi,
Zhang Mingli
www.hashdata.xyz
Hi, Tomas
On Dec 31, 2023 at 07:10 +0800, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com>,
wrote:
> Sadly, there's no explanation why parallel scans do not allow disabling
> sync scans just like serial scans - and it's not quite obvious to me.
Feel confused too.
```
Assert(!IsBootstrapProcessingMode());
Assert(allow_sync);
snapshot = scan->rs_snapshot;
```
I dig this for a while and found that there a close relationship between field
phs_syncscan(For parallel scan) and the allow_sync flag.
In table_block_parallelscan_initialize() ParallelTableScanDescData.phs_syncscan
is set.
/* compare phs_syncscan initialization to similar logic in initscan */
bpscan->base.phs_syncscan = synchronize_seqscans &&
!RelationUsesLocalBuffers(rel) &&
bpscan->phs_nblocks > NBuffers / 4;
And the allow_sync is always set to true in initscan(), when phs_syncscan is
not NULL.
if (scan->rs_base.rs_parallel != NULL)
{
/* For parallel scan, believe whatever ParallelTableScanDesc
says. */
if (scan->rs_base.rs_parallel->phs_syncscan)
scan->rs_base.rs_flags |= SO_ALLOW_SYNC;
else
scan->rs_base.rs_flags &= ~SO_ALLOW_SYNC;
}
And phs_syncscan is used in
table_block_parallelscan_startblock_init(),table_block_parallelscan_nextpage()
to do sth of syncscan.
Back to the Assertion, else branch means param scan(parallel scan desc) is not
null and we are in parallel scan mode.
else
{
/*
* Parallel index build.
*
* Parallel case never registers/unregisters own snapshot.
Snapshot
* is taken from parallel heap scan, and is SnapshotAny or an
MVCC
* snapshot, based on same criteria as serial case.
*/
Assert(!IsBootstrapProcessingMode());
Assert(allow_sync);
snapshot = scan->rs_snapshot;
}
Agree with you that: why all parallel plans should / must be synchronized?
Parallel scan should have a choice about syncscan.
Besides that I think there is a risk Assert(allow_sync), at least should use
phs_syncscan field here to judge if allow_sync is true according to above.
So I guess, there should be an Assertion failure of Assert(allow_sync) in
theory when we use a parallel scan but phs_syncscan is false.
/* compare phs_syncscan initialization to similar logic in initscan */
bpscan->base.phs_syncscan = synchronize_seqscans &&
!RelationUsesLocalBuffers(rel) &&
bpscan->phs_nblocks > NBuffers / 4;
However, I didn’t produce it because phs_syncscan is set according to data
size, even with some parallel cost GUCs set to 0.
And if there is not enough data, we usually do not choose a parallel plan,
like this case: build a index with parallel scan on underlying tables.
