On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 2:20 PM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > On 12/30/23 17:19, Michał Kłeczek wrote: > >> On 30 Dec 2023, at 17:16, Eric Hanson <e...@aquameta.com> wrote: > >> > >> What do you think of adding a NO RESET option to the SET ROLE command? > > > > What I proposed some time ago is SET ROLE … GUARDED BY ‘password’, so > > that you could later: RESET ROLE WITH ‘password' > > I like that too, but see it as a separate feature. FWIW that is also > supported by the set_user extension referenced elsewhere on this thread.
IMHO, the best solution here would be a protocol message to change the session user. The pooler could use that repeatedly on the same session, but refuse to propagate such messages from client connections. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
