On Tue, 12 Sept 2023 at 14:39, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 11.09.23 13:59, Jelte Fennema wrote: > > @Tom and @Robert, since you originally suggested extending the > > protocol for this, I think some input from you on the protocol design > > would be quite helpful. BTW, this protocol extension is the main > > reason I personally care for this patch, because it would allow > > PgBouncer to ask for updates on certain GUCs so that it can preserve > > session level SET commands even in transaction pooling mode. > > Right now PgBouncer can only do this for a handful of GUCs, but > > there's quite a few others that are useful for PgBouncer to preserve > > by default: > > - search_path > > - statement_timeout > > - lock_timeout > > ISTM that for a purpose like pgbouncer, it would be simpler to add a new > GUC "report these variables" and send that in the startup message? That > might not help with the psql use case, but it would be much simpler.
I have changed the status to "Waiting on Author" as Peter's comments have not been followed up yet. Regards, Vignesh
