On 2024-Jan-08, Dilip Kumar wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 4:55 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > The more I look at TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus, the more I think > > it's broken, and while we do have some tests, I don't have confidence > > that they cover all possible cases. > > > > Or, at least, if this code is good, then it hasn't been sufficiently > > explained. > > Any thought about a case in which you think it might be broken, I mean > any vague thought might also help where you think it might not work as > expected so that I can also think in that direction. It might be > possible that I might not be thinking of some perspective that you are > thinking and comments might be lacking from that point of view.
Eh, apologies. This email was an unfinished draft that I had laying around before the holidays which I intended to discard it but somehow kept around, and just now I happened to press the wrong key combination and it ended up being sent instead. We had some further discussion, after which I no longer think that there is a problem here, so please ignore this email. I'll come back to this patch later this week. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "El que vive para el futuro es un iluso, y el que vive para el pasado, un imbécil" (Luis Adler, "Los tripulantes de la noche")
