On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 08:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > Thus just adding FREEZE is not enough, seemingly. It makes me wonder if > 0174c2d21 should be superseded by a patch like discussed (or just have > autovacuum = off added)...
Adding an extra FREEZE offers an extra insurance, so I don't see why it would be a problem to add it to stabilize the horizon conflicts on the standbys. > 09.01.2024 07:59, Michael Paquier wrote: > Bertrand, thank you for updating the patch! > > Michael, it definitely increases stability of the test (tens of iterations > with 20 tests in parallel performed successfully), although I've managed to > see another interesting failure (twice): > 13 # Failed test 'activeslot slot invalidation is logged with vacuum > on pg_class' > 13 # at t/035_standby_logical_decoding.pl line 227. Something I'd like to confirm here: you still see this failure with the patch, but without an extra FREEZE, right? If we do both, the test would get more stable, wouldn't it? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
