Dear Alexander, Amit, > > But tomorrow it could be for other tables and if we change this > > TRUNCATE logic for pg_largeobject (of which chances are less) then > > there is always a chance that one misses changing this comment. I feel > > keeping it generic in this case would be better as the problem is > > generic but it is currently shown for pg_largeobject. > > Yes, for sure. So let's keep it generic as you prefer. > > Thank you!
Thanks for working the patch. I'm also OK to push the Amit's fix patch. Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
