On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:20:39PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > I agree with your points. While the other I/O related work is > happening we can discuss what we should do in the variable op_byte > cases. Also, this is happening only for WAL right now but if we try to > extend pg_stat_io in the future, that problem possibly will rise > again. So, it could be good to come up with a general solution, not > only for WAL.
Okay, I've marked the patch as RwF for this CF. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
