On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Akshat Jaimini <destrex...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > I was going through the previous conversations for this particular patch and > it seems that this patch failed some tests previously? > Imo we should move it to the next CF so that the remaining issues can be > resolved accordingly.
So I guess the question here is whether this is thought to be ready for serious review or whether it is still thought to need work. If the latter, it should be marked RwF until that happens -- if the former, then we should try to review it rather than letting it languish forever. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
