"David E. Wheeler" <da...@justatheory.com> writes:
> On Jan 24, 2024, at 16:32, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> + <para>
>> + Predicate check expressions are required in the
>> + <literal>@@</literal> operator (and the
>> + <function>jsonb_path_match</function> function), and should not be
>> used
>> + with the <literal>@?</literal> operator (or the
>> + <function>jsonb_path_exists</function> function).
>> + </para>
>> + </note>
>> + </sect4>
> I had this bit here:
> <para>
> Conversely, non-predicate <type>jsonpath</type> expressions should not
> be
> used with the <literal>@@</literal> operator (or the
> <function>jsonb_path_match</function> function).
> </para>
I changed the preceding para to say "... check expressions are
required in ...", which I thought was sufficient to cover that.
Also, the tabular description of the operator tells you not to do it.
> What do you think of also dropping the article from all the references to
> “the strict mode” or “the lax mode”, to make them “strict mode” and “lax
> mode”, respectively?
Certainly most of 'em don't need it. I'll make it so.
regards, tom lane
