On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 09:03, vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 16:06, David Geier <geidav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On 2/14/23 13:48, David Geier wrote: > > > > > > It still fails. > > > > > > I'll get Cirrus-CI working on my own Github fork so I can make sure it > > > really compiles on all platforms before I submit a new version. > > > > It took some time until Cirrus CI allowed me to run tests against my new > > GitHub account (there's a 3 days freeze to avoid people from getting > > Cirrus CI nodes to mine bitcoins :-D). Attached now the latest patch > > which passes builds, rebased on latest master. > > > > I also reviewed the first two patches a while ago in [1]. I hope we can > > progress with them to further reduce the size of this patch set. > > > > Beyond that: I could work on support for more OSs (e.g. starting with > > Windows). Is there appetite for that or do we rather want to instead > > start with a smaller patch? > > Are we planning to continue on this and take it further? > I'm seeing that there has been no activity in this thread for nearly 1 > year now, I'm planning to close this in the current commitfest unless > someone is planning to take it forward.
Since the author or no one else showed interest in taking it forward and the patch had no activity for more than 1 year, I have changed the status to RWF. Feel free to add a new CF entry when someone is planning to resume work more actively. Regards, Vignesh