Hi, In <caeg8a3lxnbwnrprwvmimdvokpvyl8pb1+rhlbnxjeddft3m...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 15:27:15 +0800, Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree CopyToRoutine should be placed into CopyToStateData, but > why set it after ProcessCopyOptions, the implementation of > CopyToGetRoutine doesn't make sense if we want to support custom > format in the future. > > Seems the refactor of v11 only considered performance but not > *extendable copy format*. Right. We focus on performance for now. And then we will focus on extendability. [1] [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20240130.171511.2014195814665030502.kou%40clear-code.com#757a48c273f140081656ec8eb69f502b > If V7 and V10 have no performance reduction, then I think V6 is also > good with performance, since most of the time goes to CopyToOneRow > and CopyFromOneRow. Don't worry. I'll re-submit changes in the v6 patch set again after the current patch set that focuses on performance is merged. > I just think we should take the *extendable* into consideration at > the beginning. Introducing Copy{To,From}Routine is also valuable for extendability. We can improve extendability later. Let's focus on only performance for now to introduce Copy{To,From}Routine. Thanks, -- kou
