On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 6:07 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2024-Feb-04, vignesh C wrote: > > > We should do something about these kinds of entries, there were few > > suggestions like tagging under a new category or so, can we add a new > > status to park these entries something like "Waiting for direction". > > The threads which have no discussion for 6 months or so can be flagged > > to this new status and these can be discussed in one of the developer > > meetings or so and conclude on these items. > > Maybe a new status is appropriate ... I would suggest "Stalled". Such a > patch still applies and has no pending feedback, but nobody seems > interested. Making a patch no longer stalled means there's discussion > that leads to: > > 1. further development? Perhaps the author just needed more direction. > 2. a decision that it's not a feature we want, or maybe not in this > form. Then we close it as rejected. > 3. a reviewer/committer finding time to provide additional feedback. >
+1. This suggestion sounds reasonable. I think we probably need to decide the time when the patch's status should be changed to "Stalled". -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
