On Friday, February 23, 2024 5:07 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 02:15:11PM +0530, shveta malik wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 1:28 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> > <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Because one could create say the "=" OPERATOR in their own schema,
> > > attach a function to it doing undesired stuff and change the
> > > search_path for the database the sync slot worker connects to.
> > >
> > > Then this new "=" operator would be used (instead of the
> > > pg_catalog.= one), triggering the "undesired" function as superuser.
> >
> > Thanks for the details. I understand it now. We do not use '=' in our
> > main slots-fetch query but we do use '=' in remote-validation query.
> > See validate_remote_info().
>
> Oh, right, I missed it during the review.
>
> > Do you think instead of doing the above, we can override search-path
> > with empty string in the slot-sync case.
> > SImilar to logical apply worker and autovacuum worker case (see
> > InitializeLogRepWorker(), AutoVacWorkerMain()).
>
> Yeah, we should definitively ensure that any operators being used in the query
> is coming from the pg_catalog schema (could be by setting the search path or
> using the up-thread proposal).
>
> Setting the search path would prevent any risks in case the query is changed
> later on, so I'd vote for changing the search path in validate_remote_info()
> and
> in synchronize_slots() to be on the safe side.
I think to set secure search path for remote connection, the standard approach
could be to extend the code in libpqrcv_connect[1], so that we don't need to
schema
qualify all the operators in the queries.
And for local connection, I agree it's also needed to add a
SetConfigOption("search_path", "" call in the slotsync worker.
[1]
libpqrcv_connect
...
if (logical)
...
res = libpqrcv_PQexec(conn->streamConn,
ALWAYS_SECURE_SEARCH_PATH_SQL);
Best Regards,
Hou zj
