On 2/16/24 02:35, shihao zhong wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:08 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:36:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> You've indeed grabbed some historical inconsistencies here. Please >>> note that your patch has reversed diffs (for example, the SQL >>> definition of pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea uses bytea,text,text as arguments >>> and your resulting patch shows how HEAD does the job with >>> bytea,bytea,bytea), but perhaps you have generated it with a command >>> like `git diff -R`? >> >> The reversed part of the patch put aside aside, I've double-checked >> your patch and the inconsistencies seem to be all addressed in this >> area. > Thanks for fixing and merging this patch, I appreciate it! >
Should this be marked as committed, or is there some remaining part? regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
