On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:11 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
...
> + /*
> + * "*" is not accepted as in that case primary will not be able to
> know
> + * for which all standbys to wait for. Even if we have physical slots
> + * info, there is no way to confirm whether there is any standby
> + * configured for the known physical slots.
> + */
> + if (strcmp(*newval, "*") == 0)
> + {
> + GUC_check_errdetail("\"*\" is not accepted for
> standby_slot_names");
> + return false;
> + }
>
> Why only '*' is checked aside from validate_standby_slots()? I think
> that the doc doesn't mention anything about '*' and '*' cannot be used
> as a replication slot name. So even if we don't have this check, it
> might be no problem.
>
Hi, a while ago I asked this same question. See [1 #28] for the response..
----------
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS0PR01MB571646B8186F6A06404BD50194BDA%40OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
