On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 03:44:34PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 11:40:00PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: >> Do you have any thoughts on reverting 007693f and introducing >> invalidation_reason? > > Unless I am misinterpreting some details, ISTM we could rename this column > to invalidation_reason and use it for both logical and physical slots. I'm > not seeing a strong need for another column. Perhaps I am missing > something...
And also, please don't be hasty in taking a decision that would involve a revert of 007693f without informing the committer of this commit about that. I am adding Amit Kapila in CC of this thread for awareness. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
