On 2024-Mar-06, Thomas Munro wrote: > Even on the heap, 16GB is too much to assume we can allocate during a > base backup. I don't claim that's a real-world problem for > incremental backup right now in master, because I don't have any > evidence that anyone ever really uses --with-segsize (do they?), but > if we make it an initdb option it will be more popular and this will > become a problem. Hmm.
Would it work to use a radix tree from the patchset at https://postgr.es/m/canwcazb43znrk03bzftnvrafhzngzh26sjc0ep-sj8+w20v...@mail.gmail.com ? -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "E pur si muove" (Galileo Galilei)
