Le vendredi 8 mars 2024, 14:36:48 CET Tomas Vondra a écrit :
> > My guess would be 8af25652489, as it's the only storage-related commit.
> > 
> > I'm currently running tests to verify this.
> 
> Yup, the breakage starts with this commit. I haven't looked into the
> root cause, or whether the commit maybe just made some pre-existing
> issue easier to hit. Also, I haven't followed the discussion on the
> pgsql-bugs thread [1], maybe there are some interesting findings.
> 

If that happens only on HEAD and not on 16, and doesn't involve WAL replay, 
then it's not the same bug. 

--
Ronan Dunklau




Reply via email to