On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 02:33:52PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The 0002 patch looks sensible. It would be good to fix that, otherwise it > could have some confusing outcomes in the future.
You mean if we begin to use %m in future callers of emit_tap_output_v(), hypothetically? That's a fair argument. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
